Our People

James E. Oldendorph Jr.

Associate, Los Angeles

James has extensive litigation experience, including case evaluations, litigation planning and strategy, initial and responsive pleadings, discovery, law and motion practice, trial preparation, settlement negotiations, mediations and arbitrations in State Court and Federal Court matters and before administrative agencies. James is also experienced in representing LCW clients in various administrative appeal hearings.  He advises clients in all matters pertaining to employment, education and labor law.  James is also fluent in Spanish, and utilizes this skill in consulting with LCW's Spanish speaking clients and in translating and drafting correspondence and contracts in Spanish.

Prior to joining Liebert Cassidy Whitmore's Los Angeles office, James' practice included a diverse civil trial practice including commercial litigation, products liability, consumer warranty law, collections and toxic tort litigation.

Representative Matters

Litigation

  • Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, a Division of the Rail Conference, International Brotherhood of Teamsters; Glenn William Steele v. Southern California Regional Rail Authority, d/b/a Metrolink (2011) - In a case handled by Steve Berliner and James Oldendorph of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore's Los Angeles office, the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled that Metrolink's installation and operation of an audio and video monitoring system in the cabs of Metrolink locomotives did not violate the locomotive engineers' privacy rights, due process rights, and that the actions were not preempted by state law.  The union for the engineers that operate the locomotives, and one individual engineer, had sued Metrolink seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, arguing that the engineers had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the cabs of the locomotives, and that Metrolink's monitoring system violated their procedural and substantive due process rights.  They also claimed that the installation of the cameras and the policy adopted to govern their use were preempted by state law. The Court granted Metrolink's motion for summary judgment on all of Plaintiffs' causes of action, finding that there were no issues of material fact warranting trial.  This ruling resulted in a victory for Metrolink on all claims.

Affiliations

Long Beach Junior Chamber of Commerce, Member Since 2009

Publications

Education

  • JD, Southwestern Law School, Los Angeles
  • BA, University of California, Santa Barbara
To Contact Liebert Cassidy Whitmore:
Los Angeles 310.981.2000 | Fresno 559.256.7800 | San Francisco 415.512.3000 | info@lcwlegal.com
© 2012 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore